The weak stream of lies from Tisza over the past two days is over!
It is truly disgusting, though not surprising from Péter Magyar and the pro-Ukrainian agent media, that they are capable of making a fool out of a police officer and exploiting him for political purposes to cover themselves in the Ukrainian espionage scandal.
Bence Szabó could not have known anything about the counterintelligence operation, so his assessment of the whole case is completely false.
Meanwhile, Tisza’s IT specialist himself admitted that he had been recruited by the Ukrainians.
Thus, the Constitution Protection Office Hungary was simply doing its job. In contrast, Péter Magyar allowed Ukrainian services into the party’s systems.
Too irresponsible, too amateur, too risky.
In two weeks, Fidesz is the safe choice!
Those who have listened to Bence Szabó’s interviews in recent days, I would now ask to listen to what the former Tisza IT specialist, identified by the initials H.D., actually says word for word about how at one point he himself had the feeling that he had essentially been recruited.
Something resembling recruitment, some kind of preparation for a later operation, because several suspicious things had come up. And he was being prepared for a later action.
When Bence Szabó gave his statements, he could not have known that this interview existed, or that the state security authorities were carrying out this kind of work. So I assume nothing else than that he simply did not possess this information.
However, those who, in my opinion, tried to exploit Bence Szabó’s situation—his lack of knowledge in this sense—are the Tisza Party Hungary, who are still working to cover up how deeply and closely they are actually cooperating with the Ukrainian state apparatus.
🧠 Quick Situation Overview
👉 Main narrative:
- “Tisza = Ukrainian spy network”
- “Magyar Péter = irresponsible / let them in”
- “The state = acted correctly”
- “Election = security vs. danger”
👉 Actual structure:
- uncertain, conditional statements
- rewritten → as a certain, proven espionage case
🔍 Manipulation techniques (exactly where it distorts)
1️⃣ “He admitted it” = false certainty
👉 Excerpt:
“he himself admitted that he was recruited by the Ukrainians”
👉 Actual content (even based on the text!):
- “he had a feeling”
- “recruitment-like”
- “suspicious things”
👉 Technique:
➡️ feeling → presented as fact
👉 Goal:
👉 turn an unproven situation → into a “closed spy case”
👉 Effect:
👉 the reader thinks: “he admitted it → case closed”
2️⃣ Conditional → declarative rewrite (core distortion)
👉 Excerpt:
“he was prepared for a later operation”
👉 Reality:
- no concrete operation
- no concrete task
- no concrete evidence
👉 Technique:
➡️ possibility → presented as a completed fact
👉 Goal:
👉 reinforce the narrative
👉 Effect:
👉 “this definitely happened”
3️⃣ Enemy construction (enemy framing)
👉 Excerpt:
“pro-Ukrainian agency media”
“Ukrainian state machinery”
👉 Technique:
➡️ labeling without evidence
➡️ all actors merged into one block
👉 Goal:
👉 complex situation → simple “enemy”
👉 Effect:
👉 automatic rejection
4️⃣ Guilt by association
👉 Excerpt:
“Magyar Péter… let Ukrainian services into the systems”
👉 Problem:
- no concrete evidence
- no concrete action
👉 Technique:
➡️ connection → presented as guilt
👉 Goal:
👉 political discrediting
👉 Effect:
👉 “he is involved too”
5️⃣ Exploiting information asymmetry
👉 Excerpt:
“Szabó Bence could not have known anything”
👉 Technique:
➡️ “we know something others don’t”
👉 Goal:
👉 speaker = insider, credible
👉 Effect:
👉 criticism is automatically weakened
6️⃣ Premature closure of the narrative
👉 Excerpt:
“Thus the Constitutional Protection Office simply did its job”
👉 Technique:
➡️ closing the debate without proof
👉 Goal:
👉 prevent further questions
👉 Effect:
👉 “then everything is fine”
7️⃣ Repetition + emotional loading (propaganda engine)
👉 Excerpt:
“too irresponsible, too amateur, too risky”
👉 Technique:
➡️ emotional stacking (not information!)
👉 Goal:
👉 fix a negative impression
👉 Effect:
👉 rational thinking is pushed aside
8️⃣ Accusation inversion
👉 Excerpt:
“they are exploiting the police officer”
👉 Technique:
➡️ flips the criticism
👉 Goal:
👉 clean up own side
👉 Effect:
👉 “they are not the ones at fault”
9️⃣ Conspiracy chaining
👉 Structure of the claim:
- Ukrainians
- IT specialist
- media
- politicians
→ everything is connected
👉 Technique:
➡️ linking separate, unproven elements
👉 Goal:
👉 create a large, threatening story
👉 Effect:
👉 “this is too much to be a coincidence”
🔟 Election closing (call-to-action propaganda)
👉 Excerpt:
“In two weeks, Fidesz is the safe choice”
👉 Technique:
➡️ fear → political decision
👉 Goal:
👉 mobilization
👉 Effect:
👉 “if I’m afraid → I vote for them”
🔥 Core distortion (summary)
👉 The biggest manipulation in the text:
➡️ an uncertain, feeling-based story
→ rewritten as a concrete, proven espionage case
⚠️ In short: where it “lies”
- no concrete evidence → yet presented as fact
- no concrete operation → yet framed as a “future operation”
- no concrete connection → yet “he let them in”
- no proven network → yet “deep cooperation”
🧠 In one sentence
👉 This is not proof, but:
👉 feeling + suggestion + fear = a ready-made spy narrative
