Are they ignorant, or are they lying?
My response to the primitive speech by Gergely Karácsony and Dávid Vitézy, with their ÁVH, Arrow Cross and SS comparisons.

It is Gergely Karácsony who is “ÁVH-ing” Fidesz representatives — the same Karácsony who was the favorite and prime-ministerial candidate of Klára Dobrev, granddaughter of Antal Apró who approved the reprisals after 1956, of Gyula Horn the “pufajkás,” and of Ferenc Gyurcsány, associated with the eye-shootings. Do I need to say anything more, Ildikó? Pitiful anti-communist rhetoric from a mayor who served the successors of the communists for twenty years.

And then Dávid Vitézy’s SS-officer comparisons. Surely during his frequent holidays from Los Angeles to Vienna he walks around with his eyes closed. Today, Jewish people live in the greatest safety in Budapest. Meanwhile, in cities of countries dominated by the kind of left-liberal politics represented by Tisza, Karácsony and Vitézy, Jewish communities live in fear and are fleeing after becoming victims of rampaging violence by illegal migrants. He must not have noticed — quite the “expert”…

I understand it’s campaign season, and that both Karácsony Gergely and Dávid Vitézy are pushing hard for Tisza, but that doesn’t mean they have to go full idiot mode.

With Fidesz, every Hungarian benefits — even those who don’t vote for us. We are the party of security and peace. That’s why Fidesz is the safe choice.

---

First of all, Mayor Gergely Karácsony, who compares my fellow representative sitting here to the servants of all kinds of oppressive dictatorships. When I hear him speak here, the Arrow Cross thugs and ÁVH officers come to mind. You know? I think it is extremely brazen that Gergely Karácsony talks about oppressive dictatorships while having spent recent years together with Klára Dobrev, the granddaughter of Antal Apró — he was twice the prime-ministerial candidate of the party of Apró Antal’s granddaughter, among others. Of Ferenc Gyurcsány’s party — the one associated with eye-shootings. I think it is at the very least cynical for the mayor to come forward with statements like this.

And the same goes for faction leader Dávid Vitézy, who brings up SS officers. It’s hard to imagine who volunteered to assist the work of the SS in Budapest, but somehow that’s how I picture it. The situation is, Mr. Representative, Mr. Faction Leader, that if you pulled your head out a little from behind Péter Magyar’s shoulder — or some other body part — and looked around the world, you might see what is happening. If you opened your eyes during your trips abroad, you would see that Jewish communities are nowhere in Europe as safe as they are in Hungary. And that is because Hungary did not give in to that left-liberal madness which you — and the Mayor — support and are part of, that left-liberal policy which allowed migration to run free across Europe. Jewish communities are safe here because we did not let illegal migrants into Hungary.

🎭 What is this speech actually?

This is not a response, not a debate, not an argument.
This is emotional warfare speech, where the goal is:

👉 to designate enemies
👉 to perform moral superiority
👉 to trigger fear + disgust
👉 and to shut down thinking

---

1️⃣ Historical horror as a weapon arsenal

They throw these in rapid succession:

• ÁVH
• Arrow Cross
• SS
• communist
• 1956 reprisals
• “pufajkás”
• “eye-shooter”

This is not historical analysis, but:

moral contamination by association

The logic:

If you place enough historical horror next to someone’s name → that person becomes morally invalid.

❌ No proof
❌ No concrete act
✔️ Only historical horror scenery

This method is called: associative demonization.

---

2️⃣ The total elimination of debate

Notice something:
Not one word about what Karácsony or Vitézy actually said.

Only this:

“who was on a list with whom”
“whose grandparent was who”
“who stands behind whose shoulder”

This is personal liquidation, not politics.

👉 What remains in the listener’s mind:
“these are immoral people”, therefore whatever they say is automatically false.

Classic move:

❗ Discredit the person → no need to deal with the arguments.

---

3️⃣ Using Jewish communities as a political shield

This is one of the most serious parts.

The structure:

1. abroad = chaos, migrant violence
2. there Jews are afraid
3. Hungary = safety
4. → therefore whoever criticizes the government endangers Jewish safety

This is no longer just campaigning, it is:

⚠️ moral hostage-taking

An entire community is used as political justification.

No data — only this:

“we protect them, others endanger them”

Emotionally powerful — and that’s exactly why it’s dangerous.

---

4️⃣ The outside world as a nightmare movie

Los Angeles, Vienna, Europe →
“rampaging migrants”, “Jews fleeing”

This is the classic:

🌍 External hell – internal refuge narrative

Its function:

“If you don’t vote for us → this comes here too”

This is fear-based loyalty.

---

5️⃣ The final closure: thinking STOP

“We are the party of security and peace.”
“With Fidesz, every Hungarian benefits.”

These are not arguments but:

🔒 psychological closing statements

The beginning emotionally agitates →
the end provides the “solution”:

vote for us → you’ll be saved

---

🧠 Why is the tone this extreme?

Because this is no longer about persuasion, but about:

✔️ mobilizing the tribe
✔️ maintaining a combat mood
✔️ building a “us vs them” war psychology

This style appears when:

👉 politics shifts from policy debate to identity conflict.

---

⚖️ From a human dignity perspective

This speech:

• does not debate
• does not respect
• does not distinguish between individuals and historical crimes
• uses collective guilt logic

It uses the very language it claims to condemn.

---

One-sentence summary:

This was not a political response, but an emotional artillery barrage, using historical trauma, fear, and moral stigmatization so the audience doesn’t think — only chooses a side.

You won’t believe this: the Ukrainian press is now openly writing that after the 2026 elections, Hungarian combat aircraft could be sent to Ukraine.
They are no longer hiding their plan: they are waiting for the Tisza Party to come to power, because with them, the path would finally open for Hungarian weapons.

Let there be no doubt: this is nothing less than a crude attempt to interfere in Hungary’s elections. Ukraine is already calculating when it could deploy Hungarian fighter jets against the Russians.

But we will not allow our country to be dragged into this senseless conflict! Hungarians want peace and security. We say no to financing the war!
Only Fidesz is the safe choice!

For those who sometimes receive with skepticism the statements coming from Fidesz or from the Hungarian government claiming that Ukraine is hoping for a Tisza-led government—because such a government would equate Ukrainian EU accession with involvement in the war—I recommend that they take a look at what the Ukrainian press itself is writing.

The Ukrainian media has indeed written that they are hoping that if there were a change of government in 2026 and Tisza came to power—which is clearly what they are hoping for—then this would mean that Hungarian combat aircraft could arrive in Ukraine.

Well, they know it, and the Ukrainians know it too: if we remain in government, this cannot happen. Because we will not send Hungarian taxpayers’ money to Ukraine, and we do not want to be drawn into this war at all.
That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

1️⃣ What actually happened? (fact chain, no fluff)

Point zero of the source
A Ukrainian military trade outlet called Defence Express, with roughly 50,000 daily reach, published a technical–economic article about:

• L-39NG Skyfox aircraft
• prices and delivery delays
• the Czech manufacturer (Aero Vodochody)

👉 It was not a political article, not a call to action, not a plan.

Only one half-sentence appears:

“this may somewhat change with the 2026 Hungarian elections”

This is conditional speculation, not a statement of fact.

---

2️⃣ How did this become “Hungarian fighter jets in Ukraine”?

👉 Propaganda spiral

① Ukrainian review
Unian summarizes it — still cautiously.

② Mandiner distortion
Mandiner then writes:

“If Fidesz loses, Hungary may give combat aircraft to Ukraine”

🔴 This is where the leap happens:

• speculation → assertion
• “production order” → weapons transfer
• “may” → “will”

③ Political amplification
Facebook post by Máté Kocsis:

“The Ukrainian press writes that our country may hand over its combat aircraft…”

🔴 Classic external reference shield:

“I’m not saying it — they are.”

④ Self-feeding loop

• Mandiner quotes Kocsis
• MTI quotes Mandiner
• MTI quotes Kocsis, who quoted Mandiner

👉 A closed propaganda loop, with no independent external source.

---

3️⃣ Alexandra’s text – what tricks does it use?

🎭 1. “The Ukrainian press is openly writing”
➡️ Exaggeration + generalization

Reality: one outlet, one half-sentence
“openly” = emotional intensifier

---

🎭 2. Conditional → fact

Original:

“this may somewhat change”

Alexandra’s version:

“Ukraine is already calculating when it can send Hungarian fighter jets”

🔴 Logical falsification
conditional → future fact → urgent threat

---

🎭 3. Election = war

Narrative chain:

Tisza = Ukraine
Ukraine = weapons
weapons = war
war = Hungarian blood / money

👉 This is a false causal chain. Nothing in it is proven.

---

🎭 4. “Interference in Hungarian elections”

This is especially ironic, because:

❌ no Ukrainian call
❌ no Ukrainian campaign activity
❌ no demand

✔️ what does exist: Hungarian domestic fear-mongering

---

🎭 5. “We want peace — only Fidesz”

This is already mobilizing propaganda, not information.

Function:

• fear creation
• closing off alternatives
• moral coercion (“if you’re not with us, you’re pro-war”)

---

4️⃣ The NER angle – why is this awkward?

Telex’s note is not accidental:

👉 Aero Vodochody ownership links:

• formerly Kristóf Szalay-Bobrovniczky
• later Zsolt Hernádi
• then Árpád Habony

Which makes it especially absurd to claim:

“the Ukrainians want the planes”

when the manufacturer has NER-adjacent ties.

---

5️⃣ Final summary — in one sentence

This is not Ukrainian interference, but Hungarian domestic panic manufacturing, where a half-sentence from a technical trade outlet turned into
→ propaganda
→ political threat
→ electoral blackmail.

What actually happened – in brief

A minor article in a Ukrainian military-focused outlet triggered a self-reinforcing political media spiral in Hungary.

Last Friday, Defence Express, a Ukrainian patriotic military website with roughly 50,000 daily readers, published a technical and economic analysis about when and at what price Ukraine might be able to acquire L-39NG Skyfox aircraft from the Czech manufacturer Aero Vodochody.
The article focused on pricing, production capacity, and delivery delays, noting that even Hungary — which ordered 12 aircraft in April 2022 — only received its first three in May 2025.

In a single speculative sentence, the article mentioned that political circumstances in countries like Hungary might change after the 2026 Hungarian elections, which could theoretically affect delivery priorities.
No plans, requests, or political demands were described.

That same day, the Ukrainian outlet Unian summarized the article.

Three days later, the Hungarian pro-government outlet Mandiner published a headline claiming that if Fidesz loses the election, Hungary may give combat aircraft to Ukraine.
This framing converted a conditional technical remark into a political claim.

On Tuesday morning, Máté Kocsis echoed this interpretation on Facebook, presenting it as something “the Ukrainian press is saying.”

Mandiner then summarized Kocsis’s post, and shortly after, the state news agency MTI summarized Mandiner’s summary — and then summarized Kocsis summarizing Mandiner.
The story thus circulated entirely within a closed domestic media loop, without any new source or evidence.

As a result, a speculative half-sentence from a niche Ukrainian outlet was transformed into a Hungarian political narrative about foreign interference, opposition betrayal, and imminent military involvement — despite no such claims existing in the original source.

(Additional context: the Czech manufacturer Aero Vodochody has long had investors linked to Hungary’s NER circle, which makes the later political framing particularly ironic.)

https://telex.hu/zacc/2026/01/27/fidesz-mandiner-mti-szemle-ukrajna-repulogep

❗️There is a war next door, sanctions are hitting the economy, energy prices are soaring — and yet: in Hungary, more and more measures are being implemented to support families, young people, and the elderly.

🏡 Home-creation support is coming, worth up to one million forints net per month, the FIX3 program is gaining momentum, law-enforcement personnel receive six months’ worth of “weapon money,” the minimum wage and the guaranteed minimum wage are rising, and the average salary has already surpassed 750,000 forints.

💸 The free cash-withdrawal limit is being doubled, the full 13th-month pension is arriving, the first part of the 14th-month pension is being launched, and pensioners will also receive a 3.6% pension increase — bringing the average pension to nearly 260,000 forints.

👫🏻 Families are receiving even more support: mothers under 40 with two children will be exempt from personal income tax, the family tax allowance will be doubled — meaning families will keep a net 20,000 forints per month for one child, 40,000 per child for two children, and 66,000 per child for three children. The allowance for dependents who are permanently ill or severely disabled will also increase.

👩🏻‍🏫 Meanwhile, workers in the cultural sector receive a 15% pay raise, teachers will get another 10% increase, and their average salary may rise to as much as 936,000 forints gross.

❄️ And for the extremely cold January period, we will introduce a utility price cap — the details are already being worked out.

👉🏻 We are not imposing austerity or raising taxes. We are not throwing Hungarian people’s money at Ukraine or migrants.
We pursue a peace-oriented, family-friendly, work-based policy. 🇭🇺

While there is uncertainty elsewhere, here there is predictability.
While Europe is tightening belts and rearming, we are spending on Hungarians.

That’s why more and more people feel that we are moving forward.
That’s why there is a vision for the future.
And that’s why Fidesz is the safe choice! 🧡

Brussels and the Tisza Party would put Hungary’s energy security at risk – the national government will not allow this.

Brussels has decided: by 2027 it would cut Hungary off from cheap Russian energy. The price of this decision is clear: utility bills could triple, fuel could reach 1,000 forints per liter, factories could close, and tens of thousands of jobs could be lost.

All of this could still have been prevented through a vote of no confidence against the European Commission – but the Tisza Party sided with Brussels. When the choice had to be made between Hungarian interests and Ursula von der Leyen, the party of Péter Magyar chose Brussels.

The national government, however, will not back down: it will challenge the decision before the European Court of Justice and will pursue the case to the end.

The Tisza Party would abolish utility cost cuts – we will defend them.

The stakes are clear: low utility bills for Hungarian families, or Brussels diktats and triple-sized bills.

There is no compromise on this.

Fidesz is the safe choice!

Last week in Brussels, a completely unlawful decision was made to require member states to phase out cheap Russian energy by 2027. For Hungary, this would mean 1,000-forint fuel prices, utility costs rising up to threefold, and the closure of many factories – leading to thousands or even tens of thousands of Hungarians losing their jobs.

The Hungarian government has decided not to let this go unanswered, which is why it will turn to the European Court of Justice. And if we remain in government – rather than those who wish to be humble servants of Brussels – it is possible that we will successfully carry this lawsuit through to the end.

We will not allow Hungarian people’s jobs, security, and livelihoods to be put at risk in Brussels for their own calculated financial interests.

We know that the Tisza Party is not on this side, as can be seen from their newly recruited candidates. They have brought in new faces who are not interested in Russian gas, but in disconnecting from it. One example is István Kapitány, a former Shell executive, who has argued for increasing capacity by 4–5% annually until 2030. And where did they recruit their new foreign policy candidate, Anita Orbán? From a former London-based company that was also involved in energy business.

I believe this clearly shows which side they are on.

One thing is certain: as long as we are in government, Hungarian people are safe, and we will not allow Hungary’s future to be put at risk.

1️⃣ Invented doomsday + a specific date → manufactured panic

“Hungary will be cut off by 2027.”

This is not a fact, but a threatening timeline.

❌ There is no:

• specific EU legislation,
• adopted implementation plan,
• unanimous decision by member states.

✔️ What is there:

• a fixed date,
• catastrophic consequences (triple utility bills, €2.50 fuel, factory closures).

👉 Function:
“Now is the time to be afraid. Now is the time to decide.”

---

2️⃣ “Brussels” as a faceless enemy

Here, “Brussels” is not an institution — it’s a bogeyman.

❌ What is missing:

• which body,
• which decision,
• who voted for it and when.

✔️ What it does:

• collapses the entire decision-making structure of the European Union into a single word,
• then frames it as the source of all problems.

---

3️⃣ False dilemma (black-and-white trap)

“Low utility prices or a Brussels diktat.”

This is logical coercion.

🔴 Omitted alternatives:

• transitional solutions,
• diversification,
• market adaptation,
• gradual transition.

👉 Message:
“If you’re not with us, you’re against us — and you’ll starve.”

---

4️⃣ Political scapegoating: Tisza = traitor

The Tisza Party is not treated as a political opponent, but as:

• “Brussels’ accomplice,”
• “a submissive servant,”
• “a betrayer of Hungarian interests.”

❌ There is no:

• voting record,
• concrete motion,
• actual decision presented.

✔️ There is:

• moral judgment without evidence.

---

5️⃣ Personalization = character assassination

Names are dropped (István Kapitány, Anita Orbán) without actions.

👉 Classic trick:

• “former multinational,”
• “London-based company,”
• “energy = enemy.”

This is not proof — it’s guilt by association.

---

6️⃣ Rule-of-law stage prop: “We’ll challenge it at the European Court”

Mentioning the European Court is reassurance, not a solution.

❗ What remains unsaid:

• what exactly is being challenged,
• on what legal basis,
• with what chances,
• within what timeframe.

👉 Function:
“Don’t worry — we’ll take care of it.”

---

7️⃣ Final emotional closure: “As long as we are in government…”

This is not a statement — it’s a promise combined with fear management.

✔️ Security = staying in power
❌ Debate = danger

---

🧠 In summary — what does this text do?

• It does not inform.
• It does not prove.
• It does not debate.

👉 It manufactures fear,
👉 assigns enemies,
👉 triggers reflexes.

This is not energy policy.
This is electoral psychology.

No, no, and no!
We will not allow Hungarian money to end up in the hands of Ukrainian oligarchs!
We will not allow Brussels to finance the war with Hungarian money!
We will not allow utility prices to skyrocket because of bad Brussels policies!
That is why the government is launching a national petition.
That is why Fidesz is the safe choice!

Máté writes that we should fill out the national petition as extensively as possible if we don’t want them to take even the shirt off our backs, because the Brussels plan is clearly aiming at that. For us, the petition will be our weapon against Weber and his allies—if that’s where Fidesz stands. Well, Máté, absolutely. And I can see that Máté understands what’s going on, because indeed these petitions serve a very useful purpose as a form of consultation in the prime minister’s hands when he is fighting his battles in Brussels. And it must be said that this is not only the Hungarian government’s independent position—that we do not want to go to war and we do not want to pour Hungarian money into Ukraine—but also the position of the Hungarian people.

🎭 What is this text, communicationally?

This is not information, but mobilizing propaganda combined with responsibility-shifting.

---

1️⃣ “No, no and no!” – emotional closure instead of arguments

The opening does not invite debate, it shuts it down:

• no data
• no decision
• no concrete Brussels resolution

👉 The purpose of the triple negation:
don’t think any further, we’ve already decided for you.

---

2️⃣ “Hungarians’ money” → “Ukrainian oligarchs”

This is a classic fear-image combination:

• “your money” (personalization)
• “oligarchs” (a morally repulsive label)

❌ Yet there is still no:

• concrete amount
• mechanism
• decision
• responsible actor

👉 There is an emotional image, but no facts.

---

3️⃣ Brussels as a universal scapegoat

“Brussels finances the war,” “Brussels makes utility prices skyrocket.”

This is a conflation technique:

• EU = war
• EU = high prices
• EU = exploitation

👉 This way, every internal problem is turned into an external attack.

---

4️⃣ The “national petition” as a magical weapon

Here comes the key trick:

“The petition will be our weapon against Weber and his allies.”

Reality:

• a petition is not a legal instrument
• it does not bind anyone in Brussels
• it has no decision-making power

👉 Its function is internal legitimization:

“It’s not me saying it – it’s the people.”

This is a political shield, not a tool.

---

5️⃣ “The Prime Minister fights in Brussels” – role mythology

According to the narrative:

• the government = a lone hero
• Brussels = an attacking empire
• the people = the supportive mass behind him

👉 This is a domestic campaign film, not foreign policy.

---

🧠 The real goal

This statement serves to:

• link Fidesz to the concept of “peace,”
• label everyone else as “pro-war,”
• demand emotional participation in the form of a petition,
• replace thinking with the illusion of action.

---

🎯 In one sentence

This is not about what is happening, but about
what you are supposed to feel, and who you are supposed to fear.

Zelensky has announced that Ukraine is already ready this year and would like to join the European Union as early as next year. Brussels is already working at full speed on implementing the plan, and next year the decision on Ukrainian membership will be on the table for the next Hungarian government. 🗣️
In the VOKS2025 vote, two million Hungarians said no to Ukraine’s accelerated EU accession, and Viktor Orbán’s government clearly represents this position. But how would Péter Magyar act? Would he be able to say no to Brussels on behalf of Hungarians? We know the answer… 🟠
That is why the safe choice is Fidesz.

Do you remember what Péter Magyar and the entire left-wing media said about Ukraine’s forced, accelerated accession to the European Union—that it was just a Fidesz fabrication? Well then, take a look at what President Zelensky himself is saying about it.
This means that the next government will decide on Ukraine’s accession to the European Union. We know exactly the position of Viktor Orbán and the Hungarian government—and we also know that of Tisza.
So yes, that’s why Fidesz is the safe choice.

🎭 What is actually happening in this statement?

1️⃣ Temporal distortion → artificial urgency

Volodymyr Zelensky’s announcement is presented like this:

• “already ready this year”
• “would join next year”
• “the decision will be on the table for the next Hungarian government”

🔴 The problem
EU accession involves:

• years of negotiations,
• unanimous decisions by member states,
• chapter-by-chapter closures.

👉 Here, time is deliberately compressed to create election panic:
“you must vote NOW, because it will be decided TOMORROW.”

---

2️⃣ Brussels as a faceless coercive force

Here, the European Union is not an institution but a threat:

• “Brussels is already working at full speed”
• “it wants to force this through”

❌ There is no:

• concrete decision,
• document,
• legal step,
• date.

✔️ What is present:

• “them” vs. “us,”
• a narrative of external pressure,
• a siege mentality.

This is a classic enemy image, not information.

---

3️⃣ VOKS2025 → a shield of legitimacy

“Two million Hungarians said no.”

🧠 The trick:

• a political consultation is treated as a referendum,
• the number replaces argumentation.

👉 Function:
“The debate is over. Anyone who questions it is against Hungarians.”

---

4️⃣ Péter Magyar as an implied culprit

Péter Magyar:

“Would he be able to say no to Brussels? We know the answer…”

🔴 This is not a statement but a suggestion.
There is no quote. No program. No decision.

👉 Communication tactic:
confidence of tone replaces missing evidence.

---

5️⃣ “We were always telling the truth” – retroactive reframing

The function of the second paragraph:

“Do you remember when they said this was just a Fidesz pub rumor?”

This is not proof, but:

• reinterpretation of a past debate,
• a “we told you so” narrative,
• discrediting critical voices.

---

6️⃣ The inevitable conclusion

Fidesz.

“So yes, that’s why Fidesz is the safe choice.”

🎯 This is the goal.
Everything before it is psychological preparation.

---

🧠 The big picture – what are they doing to you?

• They don’t give you data → they put you on an emotional track
• They don’t open a debate → they close it
• They don’t ask → they answer for you

This is not about Ukraine.
Not about the EU.
Not about Zelensky.

This is an election reflex-triggering text.

What are we reading?
Well, it turns out that an internal poll from the Tisza party has been leaked, specifically from a constituency in Somogy County, and the situation is that we are leading by a lot. Attila Gevencsér, the Fidesz candidate, stands at 44.7%, while the Tisza candidate is at 29.2%.

This proves that the Tisza politicians themselves know perfectly well that the opinion polls they produce—claiming that they are way ahead—are absolutely not real. They themselves know that they are distorting reality.

It’s also worth taking a look at the latest figures from the Hungarian Society Research Institute, which was the most accurate in predicting the final result of the 2022 elections as well. According to them, Fidesz is also clearly in the lead. So I think we should base our conclusions on this, and not on the opinion polls paid for by the Tisza party.

This is a real exposure. The internal constituency poll of Tisza in Kaposvár has been leaked, and it turns out that Fidesz could reproduce its 2022 result locally and is leading the Tisza candidate by more than 15 percentage points.

This is in line with the latest survey by Magyar Társadalomkutató, the company that most accurately predicted the 2022 election, according to which Fidesz is leading nationwide 51–41.

Therefore, Péter Magyar and his team, hand in hand with left-wing polling firms, are lying straight to the faces of the Hungarian people without batting an eye.

That’s why: Fidesz is the safe choice!

🎭 What is actually happening in this text?

This is not information—it’s trust manipulation combined with a pre-manufactured sense of victory.

---

1️⃣ “Leaked internal poll” – an unverifiable claim

“the Tisza party’s internal poll has leaked”

🔴 Problem:

• no document
• no methodology
• no data source
• no independent confirmation

👉 Function:

• illusion of secret knowledge
• “we know more than you do”
• instant appearance of credibility

This is a classic propaganda device: inside information that cannot be verified, yet is emotionally powerful.

---

2️⃣ One constituency → nationwide “exposure”

Kaposvár / Somogy / a single electoral district

👉 Trick:

• local data → national conclusion
• statistical nonsense

It’s like saying:

“It’s raining in Kaposvár, therefore there’s a storm across the entire country.”

This is deliberate distortion, not a professional mistake.

---

3️⃣ “They know they are lying” – attribution of intent without evidence

“they themselves know they are distorting reality”

🔴 What’s missing:

• internal emails
• statements
• proof

👉 What’s present:

• projecting intent onto the opponent
• constructing moral superiority
• delegitimizing the opponent’s character

This is not a rebuttal—it’s character assassination.

---

4️⃣ “Magyar Társadalomkutató = truth”

“they were the most accurate in 2022”

⚠️ Manipulative move:

• one past hit → absolute credibility

No mention of:

• margins of error
• methodological changes
• who commissioned the research
• current uncertainty

👉 This is an authoritarian argument:

“Believe us because we say so—and once we were right.”

---

5️⃣ “51–41” as an emotional sedative

“nationwide 51–41”

This is not information, but:

• reassurance
• elimination of doubt
• the feeling that “it’s already decided”

🎯 Goal:

• don’t ask
• don’t doubt
• don’t think further

---

6️⃣ Conscious deception, not a mistake

And this is where what you said comes in—and it’s crucial:

Alexandra cannot tell the truth about the polls,
and this has been confirmed by her superiors.

👉 Conclusion:

This is not analysis.
Not “bad interpretation.”
Not “exaggeration.”

🔴 This is a narrative executed on instruction.

She does not measure.
She does not analyze.
She transmits a message.

---

7️⃣ Closing line = political advertisement

“That’s why: Fidesz is the safe choice!”

This exposes everything.

The entire text is nothing more than:

• a pre-fabricated justification
• a lead-in to a campaign slogan
• “if you’re not with us, you’re believing lies”

---

🧠 Short summary

This text is:

❌ not data-driven
❌ not verifiable
❌ not methodological
❌ not professional

✅ But it is perfect propaganda:

• illusion of secret knowledge
• false certainty
• demonization of the opponent
• shutdown of thinking

❗ The statement made by the Tisza-affiliated host “it’s-fine-like-this” Ádám is unacceptable and disgusting.
But what do we expect from a political group whose leader wiretapped, blackmailed, and abused his own wife?

❌ You cannot talk about women like this.
According to them, a woman can’t be successful on her own, can’t run in an election, and can’t work for the Hungarian people?

👉 Because of people like Tóta W., Péter Magyar, and Ádám Nagy, women are afraid to step into politics.
And it’s exactly because of statements like these that we will defeat them again and again and show that we women are not intimidated by them.

Now, if last time anyone felt uneasy hearing the statements of the Tisza activist “it’s fine like this” Ádám, I think now everyone will be even more shocked. Especially girls, especially those who might have public ambitions. Because “it’s fine like this” Ádám explained, in the beloved language of the Tisza camp, that in order for someone to achieve anything in politics, well… how should this be phrased delicately… you need certain “skills” that are not exactly related to the job itself.

Just listen to what he said:
“You put in all this time and energy — how many asses you licked, how many dicks you sucked.”
“I don’t think I should apologize just because someone might feel offended by something.”

Well, it’s precisely because of statements like these that the women — or rural people, or the elderly — whom Ádám may have called stupid in that earlier video you mentioned, will not find their place with Tisza. Because where people think about them like this, where a political community’s leader or main influencer thinks about them this way, you have no place there.

🎯 The communication pattern of the “Alexandra-style” statement

This style is not an opinion — it is a recognizable political method.

---

1️⃣ Moral shock → immediate political translation

Starting point:
an unacceptable, vulgar statement.

Up to this point, it could simply be a clear condemnation.

BUT here comes the leap:

specific remark → characterization of an entire political side

This is the first trick:
turning an individual case into a systemic judgment.

---

2️⃣ Building an emotional shield (defense of women)

It introduces an undeniably strong moral theme:

👩 “You cannot speak about women like this”
👩 “This is why women are afraid to enter politics”

This does two things at once:

• elevates the speaker to moral high ground
• builds a protective shield around them

From this point on, anyone who questions the logical leap can be made to look as if they are minimizing misogyny.

This is a debate-closing technique, not a debate-opening one.

---

3️⃣ Guilt by association

The pattern:

one influencer’s statement
→ the party leader’s past
→ “these people are like this”
→ “you don’t belong there”

This is classic guilt by association.

It does not prove:

• organizational culture
• official positions
• systemic patterns

It relies only on emotional logic:
👉 “if a person like this is there → the whole environment is corrupt”

---

4️⃣ Fear directed at a target group

Primary audience: women, young girls.

The deep structure of the message:

“That is a dangerous environment for you.”

This appeals to protective instincts, not rational evaluation.

This is identity-based mobilization:
the question becomes not what they do politically,
but where you belong morally.

---

5️⃣ Moral delegitimization of the political opponent

The final claim is not:

“This statement is unacceptable.”

It becomes:

“This political community is morally unacceptable.”

That’s a crucial difference.

This is no longer criticism — it is an exclusionary moral judgment.

---

🧠 Why is this so powerful?

Because it activates three levels at once:

Level	Effect
Emotional	outrage
Moral	good vs. bad
Identity	“which side are you on?”

In this state, the brain does not analyze facts — it chooses sides.

---

⚠️ What’s the trap?

If someone responds by:

• getting personal
• relativizing
• attacking harshly

then the speaker’s narrative gets confirmed:
👉 “See? This is what they’re like.”

---

💡 In one sentence

This statement is not about the issue itself —
it’s about turning a moral topic into a political tribal boundary line.

I see that the left-wing press is now spinning on the claim that the government is still “searching for a solution” regarding the January utility price cap. This is the usual attempt to create uncertainty.

Let’s be clear: the government is not searching — it has already decided. The principled decision has been made, and the support will be provided to every Hungarian family. The cost of the extraordinary cold will not be paid by the people.

Experts are currently working on the technical details to ensure that the assistance reaches everywhere, from Budapest’s panel apartment blocks to detached houses. This is responsible, meticulous work.

While the left looks for faults even where there are none, the national government is delivering real solutions — including to homes in Budapest.

That is the difference between work and empty talk. Our job is action, not argument. We will protect Budapest’s families.

🎯 The real impact of this statement

This text does not present a solution — it performs psychological damage control.

---

🧠 1️⃣ Reassurance in uncertainty

When they say “we’ve already decided,” that is not information, but a calming phrase.
The goal is not for you to know what will happen, but to make sure you stop asking questions.

Effect:

• anger decreases,
• accountability fades,
• the feeling remains that “they’ll handle it anyway.”

---

🧓 2️⃣ Retroactive reframing of the pensioners’ bonus

Earlier, the message was:

• they received extra money,
• they are “protected,”
• they should be grateful.

Now it turns out:

• the bonus does not cover utility costs,
• it doesn’t even cover one week of extreme cold.

👉 The effect is not admitting a mistake, but rewriting its meaning:

it’s not that the system is insufficient,
it’s that “the weather was extraordinary.”

This is cognitive displacement:
the promise wasn’t false — reality simply became “unusual.”

---

❄️ 3️⃣ Shifting blame to an external cause: “the cost of the cold”

Cold weather is framed as a natural disaster, not a foreseeable, manageable risk.

Effect:

• responsibility disappears,
• decision-makers become “protectors,”
• citizens are reduced to passive sufferers.

---

🧩 4️⃣ “Experts are working on it” = buying time

This phrase does not signal a solution, but implies:

• don’t calculate yet,
• don’t ask questions,
• don’t compare.

Effect:

• the current shortfall becomes normalized,
• people burn through their own reserves in the meantime.

---

🔒 5️⃣ Closing the debate on moral grounds

“We act, others argue.”

This shuts down thinking.

Effect:

• those who ask questions are labeled “nitpicky,”
• those who complain are “ungrateful,”
• the real problem becomes unspeakable.

---

🧠 Overall effect

This statement is not about utility costs. It is about making people:

• accept that the extra money is not enough,
• stop treating that as a problem,
• and be grateful that “at least they got something.”

👉 This is not solution-focused communication.
It is the deliberate lowering of expectations.