“Jurassic Park — it has started, it has started.
László Kéri regularly visits the headquarters of the Tisza Party. What was denied before — that Kéri László is not connected to Tisza — when he or his wife talks about austerity measures, they say it’s not the Tisza Party speaking. Well of course it is the Tisza Party speaking — here it is, plain to see.
MSZP and MSZMP — a lot could be written about that. They have reactivated themselves; they’ve bloomed again around Tisza. There they are, smiling in the photo, of course, full of happiness. György Surányi, starting with Lajos Bokros — everyone looks as if they’ve taken some kind of revitalizing capsule.
The political dinosaurs of the former post-communist era have risen again. Jurassic Park has begun, it has begun, because they were in a state of suspended animation for fifteen years, and now they are vital again, feeling at the height of their strength.
They can tell the Tisza audience whatever they want — the audience applauds. They feel that within the Tisza Party they have finally found a home again, because this left-liberal way of thinking can be realized there without obstacles, with the help of Péter Magyar.
There is nothing new under the sun — these are the same old people, now operating under the codename Tisza.”**
1️⃣ “Jurassic Park” – a dehumanizing metaphor
The central image of the speech is Jurassic Park:
“the political dinosaurs of the post-communist era”
🎯 Technique: Dehumanization + ridicule framing
Those targeted are portrayed not as people or thinking political actors, but as:
- obsolete,
- dangerous,
- instinct-driven creatures.
👉 This removes the need to debate them, because “they would have gone extinct anyway.”
2️⃣ Guilt by association
The implied logic:
Kéri László → Tisza Party → austerity → “then this is Tisza speaking”
🎯 Technique: Association fallacy
There is no:
- quotation,
- decision,
- party resolution.
Only insinuation: “he goes there → therefore it’s theirs.”
3️⃣ Temporal collapse: MSZP = MSZMP = Tisza
“MSZP and MSZMP — a lot could be written about that”
🎯 Technique: Historical smear / temporal collapse
Thirty to forty years of political history are compressed into a single stain:
- if someone was ever left-wing,
- they are still the same today,
- and therefore automatically illegitimate.
👉 This is not analysis, but historical fear-mongering.
4️⃣ “They reactivated themselves” – the zombie narrative
“revitalizing capsule… suspended animation”
🎯 Technique: Zombie narrative
The political opponent is framed as:
- not new,
- not renewing itself,
- but a resurrected past.
👉 This rejects the very possibility of change.
5️⃣ Construction of a collective enemy
A list of names (without evidence):
- Surányi György
- Bokros Lajos
- “and everyone else”
🎯 Technique: Name stacking
Many names create the appearance of proof.
But there is:
- no claim,
- no action,
- no specifics.
6️⃣ Infantilization of the audience
“they can say whatever they want — they applaud”
🎯 Technique: Audience belittling
The Tisza voter is portrayed as someone who:
- does not think,
- merely reacts,
- is just “happy to clap.”
👉 This builds a sense of moral superiority.
7️⃣ Péter Magyar as the “gatekeeper”
“with the help of Péter Magyar”
🎯 Technique: Gatekeeper framing
The entire alleged “scheme” is personalized:
- he “lets them in,”
- he “covers for them,”
- he “enables them.”
👉 This makes the enemy easy to personify.
8️⃣ “Codename” – conspiracy framing
“now operating under the codename Tisza”
🎯 Technique: Conspiracy framing
The party is framed as:
- not real,
- merely a disguise,
- with “the same people behind it.”
👉 This pre-emptively immunizes the narrative against any rebuttal.
Summary – what is actually happening?
This text:
❌ does not analyze programs
❌ does not examine decisions
❌ does not use data
✔️ provokes emotional disgust
✔️ activates fear of the past
✔️ manufactures a collective enemy
🎯 Goal:
Do not ask what the Tisza Party says, but “who these people really are.”
