Category: nemeth balazs : Words vs. Facts

orban propaganda

Orbán-haters are now celebrating the fact that banning Russian gas will make utility costs more expensive. Bravo!

What I’m thinking about is this: the very same Orbán-haters who are now celebrating the Brussels decision—which practically bans EU member states from purchasing Russian natural gas with immediate effect—are the ones who have always gone on and on about the absolute supremacy of the free market.

And now they’re celebrating that Brussels is directly вмешing in the market and restricting purchasing options, which, according to basic market rules, inevitably leads to higher prices.

As a result, utility bills at home will rise too: district heating, gas prices—everything.

But they don’t care at all. As long as Orbán isn’t proven right.

They really are that simple.

1️⃣ Projecting false joy onto the opponent (“they’re celebrating higher prices”)

“Orbán-haters are celebrating that utility costs will become more expensive.”

This is a straw man.

🔹 No one is “celebrating” higher energy prices.
🔹 The debate is not about price increases, but about:

  • how risky it is to rely unilaterally on Russian gas,
  • how sustainable politically subsidized utility price cuts really were,
  • what happens when that model inevitably collapses.

👉 This assigns an emotion to the opponent in order to morally discredit them.

2️⃣ Distorting “pro-market” arguments

“Those who used to praise the free market are now celebrating Brussels’ intervention.”

This is a false contradiction.

🔹 Energy has never been a pure free market:

  • state contracts,
  • geopolitical deals,
  • politically set prices,
  • subsidies and price caps.

👉 Russian gas itself was not “free market” energy, but a political dependency.

So the novelty here is not market intervention,
but the attempt to reduce dependence on an authoritarian supplier.

3️⃣ Oversimplified causality (“ban = immediate price increase”)

“According to market laws, prices will rise.”

This is a deliberate oversimplification.

🔹 Prices are shaped by multiple factors, including:

  • alternative supply routes,
  • LNG capacity,
  • joint procurement mechanisms,
  • storage levels,
  • state compensation measures.

👉 The narrative of “automatic and immediate price hikes” is fear-mongering, not economics.

4️⃣ “They don’t care, as long as Orbán isn’t right”

This is classic loyalty blackmail.

🔹 The real questions are not about who is right, but:

  • whether the model works long term,
  • what it actually costs,
  • who pays the difference,
  • how it behaves in a crisis.

👉 The debate is reduced to personal hatred to avoid discussing how the system actually functions.

One-sentence summary

This statement is not about energy policy at all, but about pushing this message:

“If you criticize utility price cuts or Russian energy dependence, you must be happy about higher prices.”

That is emotional coercion, not an argument.

balzska orban propaganda

☝️ By the way, don’t Tisza supporters miss Magyar Péter taking a clear position on the truly important European issues?

  • What does he think about Brussels wanting to abolish Russian gas imports from 2027 onward, using legal tricks and coercion? (fresh decision from today)
  • What does he think about Brussels also using legal maneuvering to fast-track Ukraine into the European Union from 2027?
  • What does he think when his EPP boss, Manfred Weber, wants to see European young people in Ukraine wearing military uniforms with the EU flag?
  • And what does he think when Brussels openly states that from the summer of 2026, part of the illegal migrants arriving in the EU will be sent to Hungary?

The list of questions could go on.

Isn’t it suspicious to Tisza Party supporters that there are no answers to these questions from Magyar Péter?
Only dodging, evasion, and silence…

☝️ And doesn’t it bother Tisza supporters either that Magyar Péter’s “Orbán Anita” said this weekend that the ERA OF HUNGARIAN VETOES IS OVER?

In other words:
a new government would swallow everything Brussels wants to force-feed us.

❗️Stay alert, Tisza comrades! They are trying to seriously mislead you!!!

balazska…

Fidesz–Tisza: 51–41❗️
We’re heading into the final 11 weeks of the campaign with a 10-point lead ✌️

I feel a bit like Emmanuel Macron in Davos — not exactly healthy, but life doesn’t stop on Facebook.
What does help recovery is the pollster’s 51–41 measurement — and let no one forget, this is the very firm that, in 2022, nailed the expected election result most accurately in the final days of the campaign.

Fidesz–KDNP: 51, Tisza: 41, and according to them Mi Hazánk would also make it into parliament.

All in all, that’s a pretty good medicine for the flu.

🎭 This is not information — it’s mood-manufacturing

1️⃣ The number as an emotional weapon

“51–41 ❗️ 10% lead”

This is not data-sharing, but an emotional message:

👉 “Relax, we’re leading.”
👉 “If you’re with us, you’re on the winning side.”

This is the bandwagon effect (gravitating toward the winner).
Some people instinctively align themselves with whoever appears strong.

Function: a confidence boost for one’s own camp + demoralization of the opponent.

2️⃣ “This is the company that was the most accurate in 2022”

This is authoritative validation.

It doesn’t talk about the methodology of the current poll.
Not about the margin of error.
Not about the sample.

Just one message:

👉 “You can trust this.”

This preloads trust onto the number so you don’t start analyzing it.

3️⃣ The illness–recovery metaphor

“It’s a pretty good medicine for the flu.”

This is a very strong psychological trick.

Here, the number is no longer information, but an emotional painkiller.

👉 politics = emotional comfort
👉 opinion polls = mood-enhancing medication

The message to followers is:

“If you’re uncertain → look at the numbers → you can calm down.”

This is group-level emotional stabilization.

4️⃣ The Macron joke – relatability as a shield

“I’m like Macron in Davos…”

This is a casual I’m sick but still working pose.

Its function:

– makes the speaker appear human
– removes the sharp political edge
– “I’m just a guy with the flu”

This way, propaganda feels like a friendly chat — not a campaign message.

🧠 What does this do to you?

ElementEffect
51–41sense of security
“most accurate company”thinking switched off
“medicine”emotional reassurance
casual tonereduced resistance

This is not about persuasion — it’s about emotional calibration.

💡 The most important point

This is not about whether the poll is accurate.
It’s about this message:

“Don’t ask questions. Calm down. We’re leading.”

This is mood management, not public debate.

balazska lying

Fidesz–Tisza: 51–41❗️
We’re heading into the final 11 weeks of the campaign with a 10-point lead ✌️

I feel a bit like Macron in Davos — not exactly healthy, but life doesn’t stop on Facebook. Still, for a social researcher, that 51–41 measurement definitely helps recovery. And let’s not forget: this is the very polling company that, in 2022, nailed the expected result most accurately in the final days before the election sprint.

Fidesz–KDNP 51, Tisza 41, and according to them even Mi Hazánk would make it into parliament.

All in all, that’s a pretty decent medicine for the flu.

🎭 This isn’t information — it’s mood manufacturing

1️⃣ The number as an emotional weapon

“51–41 ❗️ 10% lead”

This is not data sharing — it’s an emotional message:

👉 “Relax, we’re ahead.”
👉 “If you’re with us, you’re on the winning side.”

This is the bandwagon effect (pulling people toward the perceived winner).
Some people instinctively align with whoever looks strong.

Function: a confidence injection for supporters + demoralization of the opponent.

2️⃣ “This is the company that was the most accurate in ’22”

This is authority-based validation.

It doesn’t discuss the current methodology.
Not the margin of error.
Not the sample.

Just one message:

👉 “You can trust this.”

This is pre-loading trust onto the number so you don’t start analyzing it.

3️⃣ The illness–recovery metaphor

“This is quite a good medicine for the flu”

This is a very strong psychological trick.

The number is no longer information — it becomes an emotional painkiller.

👉 politics = emotional comfort
👉 polling = mood enhancer

The message to followers:

“If you feel uncertain → look at the numbers → calm down.”

This is group-level emotional stabilization.

4️⃣ The Macron joke — relatability as a shield

“I’m like Macron in Davos…”

This is the casual, sick, but still working pose.

Its function:

  • makes him seem human
  • softens the political edge
  • “I’m just a guy with the flu”

So propaganda starts to feel like a friendly chat, not a campaign message.

🧠 What does this do to you?

ElementEffect
51–41sense of safety
“most accurate company”turns off analysis
“medicine”emotional soothing
casual tonelowers resistance

This isn’t trying to convince you.
It’s trying to set your emotional state.

💡 The key point

This isn’t about whether the poll is true.

It’s about this message:

“Don’t question. Relax. We’re leading.”

This is mood management, not public debate.

An extra in Orbán’s propaganda show.

The story of a Hungarian mother who “fled back home” from Germany because of migration and gender indoctrination.
This is why we must vote wisely.

The migration situation in Germany had become problematic. I no longer allowed my child to go into the city center, not even in broad daylight. This is a cautionary story for a new generation of voters, told by Erika, who grew up here, lived here, then moved to Germany—and eventually returned to Hungary. But why?

I had a teenage child, a daughter, whom I absolutely wanted to rescue from the educational environment and the migration-related changes we were exposed to. So a few years ago, we truly returned home to Hungary.

The migration situation in Germany was problematic. I no longer let her enter the city center even during the day, because public safety was nowhere near what it had been 10, 15, or 20 years ago.

In education, expectations around male and female roles have changed significantly, and I could not identify with that.

That is why we must pay attention to ensuring that all of Budapest—and North Pest as well—remains free from immigration.

🧠 Psychological Influence – What does this “extra interview” actually do to you?

1️⃣ The illusion of a “credible witness”

This woman is not an expert, not a decision-maker, not a data source.
Yet she is framed as someone who has “personally encountered the danger.”

👉 Psychological effect:
The viewer does not feel persuaded, but rather:

“One of us is finally saying the truth.”

This triggers identification, not thinking.

2️⃣ Fear wrapped in “motherhood”

The key element of the sentence is not migration, not gender — but the child.

“I had to rescue my teenage daughter…”

👉 This is a deliberate choice, because:

  • the mother = moral shield
  • the child = unquestionable emotional argument

The viewer’s inner reaction:

  • if you doubt → guilt
  • if you question → the feeling of being a “bad parent”

This is emotional blackmail, not argumentation.

3️⃣ Controlled panic: “not even in broad daylight”

This phrase is not accidental.

  • “in broad daylight” → nowhere is safe
  • no place, no time, no exception

👉 The goal:
There must be nothing concrete to verify.
Fear must remain floating, ungraspable.

This is what psychology calls diffuse anxiety induction.

4️⃣ The “escape” narrative

“We fled back home from Germany.”

This is an extremely strong psychological word.

👉 Message to the viewer:

  • The West = danger
  • Hungary = last refuge

Anyone who would stay or question → irresponsible.

This shuts down thinking, because from “escape” there is no debate — only survival.

5️⃣ A pre-manufactured conclusion

At the end, there is no question.

“That’s why we must vote wisely.”

👉 Psychological mechanism:

  • after the emotional surge, there is no time left to think
  • an immediate political command follows

This is classic emotional steering:
fear → relief → obedience.

🎯 What is really happening?

This interview is not about the mother.

It is a role, used to:

  • normalize fear,
  • morally disable questioning,
  • and transfer the viewer’s internal control to a political narrative.

📌 The real goal is not for you to believe.
📌 The real goal is for you to not dare to doubt.

balazs orban propaganda…

This is what the Tisza supporters are like!
They pocket million-forint teacher salaries, don’t pay taxes, receive state scholarships, and yet relentlessly criticize the government. Müller Anna’s behavior is outrageous.

The Tisza challenger is a teacher—specifically a high school teacher—who, if I saw correctly, earns a salary in the millions. She is a mother of three, so she doesn’t even have to pay certain charges, she received the Köbüki scholarship—she grabbed that from the state as well—and yet she still claims that everything is wrong with education. It’s very strange to hear this.
As for the historically large wage increase, I’d say we’re not even halfway through it yet, since it will last until 2031. If we interrupt it now and start moving backward, that would be a major step back, because the goal is to value our teachers, to make the teaching profession attractive. And it is indeed very interesting when someone—precisely as a teacher—stands against this.
I said it correctly, didn’t I, that the average gross salary is above 900,000, meaning that one-million-forint salaries easily exist. That’s right. Moreover, we know exactly that if Tisza introduces its new tax structure—which has already been backed up in many places—then teachers will certainly earn at least 100,000 forints less, and many family benefits will be taken away from them.

🎭 1. Apparent message (surface)

The statement suggests that:

  • Müller Anna is a “pampered” teacher
  • she earns a million-forint salary
  • she received a state scholarship
  • she benefits from family support
  • yet she is ungrateful because she criticizes education

Therefore, what she says is “uncredible” and “outrageous.”

This is the shop window. On the surface, it talks about money and fairness.

🎯 2. The REAL function (unspoken)

This is not a policy debate, but an act of intimidation by example.

The real goals of the message are:

❌ To take away teachers’ right to speak
❌ To punish those who criticize from within
❌ To deter other teachers from expressing public opinions

Message to the others:

“If you earn well → stay silent.”
“If you receive anything → you have no right to criticize.”

This is enforced loyalty, not argument.

🧠 3. Psychological tricks used

1️⃣ Financial delegitimization

“Million-forint salary → no right to complain”

➡️ As if income buys silence.
A moral trap: if you earn well, shut up.

2️⃣ Benefits = obligation to remain silent

Scholarship, family support, wage increase → “you owe us.”

➡️ This is feudal logic, not democratic thinking.

3️⃣ Implanting fear about the future

“If Tisza comes, you’ll earn 100,000 less.”

➡️ Projected loss without evidence.
Classic: “if not us, it will be worse.”

4️⃣ Personal attack → silencing systemic critique

The focus is not on the state of education,
but on the person criticizing it.

➡️ This is ad hominem—avoiding the real debate.

🔥 4. The most important unspoken message

The real meaning is this:

“It doesn’t matter whether you’re right.
What matters is whether you’re loyal.”

This is not about teachers.
This is about every public servant.

🧩 5. What is conspicuously missing?

❓ A single concrete professional rebuttal
❓ A single data point about education quality
❓ A single response to the actual criticisms

Instead, we get:

  • money
  • envy
  • fear
  • moral shaming

🧠 One-sentence summary (ideal for a short video)

This is not a debate about education.
It’s a message to everyone:
if you receive anything from the state, you have no right to ask questions.

orpban propaganda

The left-wing parties have already divided the turf: they want to keep North Pest in the hands of the Democratic Coalition.
That is why the Tisza Party has put forward an extremely weak candidate here. We must not allow this!

The Democratic Coalition is holding a post-New Year’s Eve event in North Pest. Their local representative, Balázs Barkóczi, managed to make everyone in the area laugh when he wrote on Facebook that he “demands a hospital for North Pest.”

This is the representative of the very party that, when it was in power, destroyed the healthcare system: they closed hospitals, drove doctors away, and introduced hospital visit fees. Since 2010, the civic government has had to gather everything from the ruins and rebuild it anew. That is why the Democratic Coalition has no place in North Pest either.

🎭 1. Apparent message (surface level)

The text claims that:

  • the Democratic Coalition has “divided up” North Pest,
  • the Tisza Party deliberately nominated a weak candidate,
  • Balázs Barkóczi is ridiculous and unserious,
  • the DK “when it was in power” destroyed healthcare,
  • everything was bad before 2010 and everything has been “rebuilt from ruins” since then,
  • therefore, the DK has no place in North Pest.

This is the shop window.

🎯 2. The REAL function (unstated)

This is not about local issues at all, but about:

  • scapegoating (“they ruined everything”),
  • activating fear tied to the past (visit fees, hospital closures),
  • deflecting attention from present-day problems,
  • identity-based rejection (“they don’t belong here”).

The goal is not for you to understand —
but to reject automatically.

🧠 3. Propaganda and psychological techniques used

1️⃣ Collective guilt

“When they were in power…”

– No individual, no decision, no date is attacked,
only an entire group.

2️⃣ Time-jump oversimplification

“Ruins before 2010, rebuilding after 2010”

– Fifteen years flattened into a single sentence,
with no process, no cost, no balance.

3️⃣ Ridicule = delegitimization

“Made everyone laugh”

– No rebuttal, no debate,
just emotional degradation.

4️⃣ Whataboutism (“but you!”)

“Someone who closed hospitals now demands one”

– The present question (Do we need a hospital?)
is replaced by accusations about the past.

5️⃣ False exclusivity

“That’s why the DK doesn’t belong here”

– As if only two states existed:

either them,
or the current power.

🚨 4. What is deliberately missing

There is no:

  • a single concrete healthcare statistic about North Pest,
  • a single current decision, budget figure, or deadline,
  • a real answer to the questions:
    • Is there hospital capacity?
    • What is missing?
    • What is being planned?

This is distraction, not information.

🧩 5. The essence in one sentence

They don’t want you to decide whether North Pest needs a hospital.
They want you to instinctively hate the person who says it out loud.

balazska wake up.. not need words..

The red mailbox is going to its first location.
By now, everyone knows that this is where we collect the problems and questions people have, the things residents are dissatisfied with, what causes everyday frustration, what they feel is missing, or even what they see as an opportunity here in Újpalota and across the 15th district.

From January 27, the mailbox will be placed on the main square in Újpalota, where it will remain until February 1. We’re waiting for your messages there, or you can also send them by email to nemetbalasvagyok@gmail.com.

We are starting a new chapter in the 15th district, as well as in the northern part of the 4th district, in Káposztásmegyer.
It’s going to be good!

balzska

The Tisza Party has fallen captive to the Bajnai–Soros circle.
It was expected. Sorry, Tisza supporters—now I’m the one who has to deliver the bad news to you. Someone has to do it. Your darlings do not want to win in April.

Here we have this new woman who was deployed from the Bajnai–Soros circle to stand next to Magyar Péter. She supported globalist multinationals, and in her very first public statement she says that she has put an end to Hungarian vetoes in the EU.

Put an end to Hungarian vetoes.

Which means:
yes to the migration pact,
yes to Ukraine’s EU membership,
yes to Hungary supplying weapons to the war,
and then sending soldiers into the war.

These people do not want to win.
With promises like this, how could anyone win an election in Hungary?

Make a bet—you’ll be better off if they don’t win. Because this Sorosist, Bajnai-aligned team would truly abolish vetoes, and Hungary would fall into a terrible state.

They would send our money to Ukraine.
Gender lobbyists would arrive.
And of course, no-go zones would form in the outer districts of Hungary’s major cities.

No!

🎭 Apparent message (surface level)

The text claims that:

  • the Tisza Party has been “captured” by a
    “Bajnai–Soros circle” (→ Bajnai Gordon, Soros György),
  • a woman was “assigned” next to Magyar Péter,
  • she is abolishing Hungarian vetoes,
  • therefore:
    • migration is coming,
    • Ukraine will join the EU,
    • weapons will be delivered,
    • soldiers will be sent,
    • gender lobby,
    • no-go zones,
    • money being “sent” to Ukraine,
  • therefore it is better if Tisza does not win.

This is the surface narrative.

🎯 The REAL function (why the text exists)

This is not information, but:

👉 fear-mongering + stigmatization + self-justifying conclusion

The goal is not to prove anything, but to:

  • trigger emotional panic,
  • pre-emptively exclude any rebuttal,
  • turn the opponent into a scapegoat,
  • and strip the listener of the ability to think.

🧩 Key techniques – point by point

1️⃣ “Bajnai–Soros circle” = a magical enemy construct

Not an organization.
Not a program.
Not a decision-making body.

A vague, unprovable label that can be pinned on anyone.

Guilt by association: what matters is not what someone says, but who can be pointed to behind them.

👉 Classic conspiracy framing.

2️⃣ Logical leap chain (domino lie)

“ends vetoes”
→ “yes to migration”
→ “yes to Ukraine”
→ “weapons deliveries”
→ “soldiers”
→ “no-go zones”

⚠️ Not a single step is proven—yet all are treated as established fact.

This is a textbook slippery slope.

3️⃣ False “inside knowledge” posture

“I’m the one telling you the bad news”

This is the prophet role:

  • no source,
  • no quotation,
  • no document,

just “I know.”

👉 Authority comes not from evidence, but from tone.

4️⃣ Paradoxical message: “they don’t want to win”

This is especially revealing.

The real message:

“If someone says something different from what we taught you to fear, then they must not want to win.”

👉 This shuts down political competition:

  • no alternative is allowed,
  • only “madness” or “betrayal.”

5️⃣ Moral blackmail + apocalypse framing

“They would send our money away”
“gender lobbyists”
“no-go zones”
“Hungary would end up in a terrible state”

This is fear stacking:
not one concrete danger, but an accumulation of emotional noise.

👉 The listener does not think—
they defend themselves.

🧠 What is conspicuously MISSING?

❌ concrete quotation
❌ legal text
❌ decision or resolution
❌ voting date
❌ source
❌ possibility of counter-argument

This is not debate.
It is a pronouncement of guilt.

🧩 Summary – what is actually happening here?

This text:

  • does not analyze the Tisza program,
  • does not argue,
  • does not prove,

but instead:

👉 manufactures fear,
👉 names an enemy,
👉 criminalizes alternatives,
👉 and tells you in advance what you must think.

orban propaganda They are actively framing poverty.

Many people from North Pest have asked whether those living in district-heated apartments will also receive support from the government — in other words, whether the January utility price freeze applies to them as well.

The answer is yes: families living in district-heated homes will also receive assistance.
The details will be finalized by Wednesday at the latest, and they will be announced on all relevant platforms.