Category: Uncategorized

alexa and ukran…

And are we supposed to die for them and give them all our money?
Former Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba is praying for a change of government in Hungary, because they expect a pro-Ukrainian government from the Tisza party.

We can see that the Ukrainians have entered the election campaign.
But we will not allow Hungarian money to be sent to Ukraine, and we will not let them drag us into the war.

We are working for peace and to ensure that, after April as well, the country has a Hungary-first government.
Let’s not take risks — only Fidesz is the safe choice!

Dmytro Kuleba, the former Ukrainian foreign minister, is very much praying for Viktor Orbán to be defeated, because then a pro-Ukrainian government could come to power. Now everyone is going around asking whether Orbán will answer the following question. We know exactly what they want, but we do not want that, because we know what a pro-Ukrainian government would mean for Hungary and for Hungarian families.

It would mean that Hungarian money — the money of Hungarian families — could be sent to Ukraine, and that Hungary could even be drawn into the war. This is, unfortunately, a realistic scenario in such a case.

That is why I say that we are working for Viktor Orbán to win. And those who pray should pray for this: that a Hungarian government remains in place that puts the interests of Hungarians first.

🔴 1️⃣ “Should we die for them?” – an instant fear button

This opening is not a real question, but a panic-triggering frame.

It does not talk about:

  • what specific decision is being discussed
  • what actual military obligation would exist
  • what Hungary’s legal position is

Instead, it jumps straight to:

➡️ you
➡️ your family
➡️ death
➡️ war

This is a classic existential threat framing.
Once people feel fear, they don’t analyze — they want to defend themselves.

🧠 2️⃣ Bringing an external enemy into a Hungarian election

Mentioning Dmitro Kuleba here is not information, but a symbolic tool.

The logic goes like this:

Ukrainian politician → prays for a change of government
⬇
Tisza = pro-Ukrainian
⬇
pro-Ukrainian = against Hungary’s interests
⬇
whoever is not Fidesz = serving foreign interests

This turns the election into a loyalty test, not a political debate.

The question is no longer:

“Which economic policy is better?”

But:

“Are you Hungarian, or are you serving foreign interests?”

This is identity politics, not policy.

⚔️ 3️⃣ “They will drag us into the war” – sense of loss of control

A key word here is “drag”.

It suggests:

  • you have no decision
  • you have no sovereignty
  • outside forces are in control

This is psychologically powerful, because people’s biggest fears include:

  • losing control
  • war
  • their children’s future

The text bundles all of these together.

💰 4️⃣ “Hungarians’ money will go to Ukraine” – simplified financial scare

Again, there is no:

  • amount
  • budget line
  • EU mechanism
  • form of support

Only the feeling:

👉 “it will be taken from you”
👉 “it will be given to someone else”

This relies on zero-sum thinking:
if they get something → you lose.

🕊️ 5️⃣ “We work for peace” – claiming the moral high ground

Here comes one of the strongest rhetorical tricks:

It doesn’t say:

“this is how we see the strategy”

Instead it says:

we = peace
others = war

This creates a moral dichotomy:

with us → peace-loving, good person
against us → pro-war, dangerous

This shuts down meaningful debate.

🎯 6️⃣ The final goal: not to persuade, but to close the mind

The closing line:

“Let’s not take risks, only Fidesz is the safe choice”

This is a safety vs. risk frame.

Not:

  • program vs. program
  • data vs. data

But:

  • Fidesz = safety
  • everything else = danger

This is aimed at uncertain voters who are afraid of change.

🧩 In summary, what propaganda elements appear here?

ElementFunction
“we would die for them”existential fear
bringing in a Ukrainian politicianexternal enemy
“drag us into war”loss of control
“our money goes to Ukraine”financial threat
“we want peace”moral superiority
“only Fidesz is safe”safety–risk framing

This text is not about the real situation regarding Ukraine, but about closing thinking along:

👉 fear
👉 identity
👉 sense of security

orban propaganda change brussel to ukrajna…

Zelensky says Ukraine is ready to start accession talks and will happily become a member of the European Union in 2027 🤡

  1. The president is quite the comedian 🤣
  2. We Hungarians will decide that, okay? 😉

Author
I am Balázs Németh

Péter Szijjártó was right — a new phase of the domestic election campaign has indeed begun. Ukrainians are doing everything they can to bring about a change of government, because they know exactly that Péter Magyar would not be able to say no to Brussels.

Alexandra’s brainwashing level is 1000.

We remember what things were like before 2010. The austerity measures, when Gordon Bajnai and the banks dictated the terms and Hungarian families paid the price. When household utility costs didn’t matter, jobs didn’t matter—only that the numbers looked good in Brussels.

Now it seems the left would bring back the very same recipe, just wrapped in different packaging.

The politicians of the Tisza Party are familiar faces with familiar backgrounds: they come from the world of globalist multinationals. People who have spent their careers chasing profits for international corporations or representing globalist interests in politics. What they all have in common is that they have never stood on the side of Hungarian families.

Let’s not be fooled: people like István Kapitány and Anita Orbán were not sent here by accident. They are here so that these power and financial circles come out on top. So that Western banks and major energy companies can once again freely squeeze Hungarians, without having to contribute to the common good.

And we also know where this would lead if they came to power: utility cost reductions would be scrapped, support schemes would be cut back, and taxes would be raised. We’ve already seen this movie before.

Hungarians deserve far more than this. That’s why the Fidesz is the safe choice.

🎭 What is actually happening in this text?

1️⃣ Designated scapegoats → personalization

“Kapitány Istváns and Orbán Anitas were not sent here by accident.”

Here, the speaker uses specific names (e.g. Kapitány István, Orbán Anita), but does not attribute concrete actions to them — only roles.

👉 Function:

  • abstract “power and financial interests” are given a human face
  • it’s easier to hate people than to analyze systems
  • guilt is implied without evidence

This is not exposure — it’s labeling.

2️⃣ Demonization of external forces

“Western banks and large energy companies”

This is a classic enemy bundle:

  • foreign
  • wealthy
  • faceless
  • “them” vs “us”

👉 The trick:
It never specifies

  • which bank,
  • which company,
  • which decision,
  • when, or how.

It only delivers the feeling:
⚠️ “They’re coming to drain us.”

3️⃣ Future fear scenario (conditional scaremongering)

“Utility price cuts would go down the drain, subsidies would be slashed, taxes would be raised.”

This is not a fact, but a conditional future narrative.

👉 Key point:

  • no program quote
  • no legislation
  • no budget calculation

Just a familiar fear checklist we’ve heard many times before.

4️⃣ “We’ve seen this movie before” – false memory appeal

This is one of the strongest psychological tools in the text.

👉 What does it do?

  • it does not prove anything
  • it tries to trigger memory
  • but never says where, when, or exactly what

The brain fills in the gaps with its own fears.

5️⃣ Moral closure + political command

“Hungarians deserve much more than this.”
“That’s why the Fidesz is the safe choice.”

The text does not end with reasoning, but with instruction.

👉 The logic:

  • if you’re afraid → that’s bad
  • if it’s bad → change is dangerous
  • if it’s dangerous → stay where you are

This is a promise of safety, not a decision framework.

🧠 Overall picture – what is this really?

❌ Not an economic policy debate
❌ Not a program critique
❌ Not a fact-based analysis

✅ An emotional escape route
✅ Fear + nostalgia + “steady hand”
✅ Triggering reflexes instead of thinking

In one sentence:

This text does not want you to understand the electoral alternatives — it wants you to fear change, and therefore stop asking questions.

Alexandra, Orbán and Brussels. Again. And again. And again. It never stops.

❗️Brussels keeps coming forward with more and more demands: they want Hungary to pay for the war, to finance the operation of the Ukrainian state, and to pay the price of the war through higher utility bills as well.

The government is launching a National Petition so that together, clearly and unequivocally, we can send a message to Brussels: we will not pay!

We must take a firm stand on three key issues, because everyone’s opinion matters now:

1️⃣ We say NO to further financing of the Russian–Ukrainian war.
2️⃣ We say NO to making Hungary pay for the operation of the Ukrainian state over the next 10 years.
3️⃣ We say NO to raising utility prices due to the war.

Let us stand together for the interests of the Hungarian people!
Only Fidesz is the safe choice! 🇭🇺

orban propaganda

Brussels wants to force a multinational executive on us, and at the same time shove 1,000-forint fuel down the throats of Hungarian motorists. We weren’t born yesterday! 😉 Sometimes you honestly end up feeling sorry for these Tisza supporters. They had to celebrate the “Dallas guy,” Jockey Wing, for three days. With the very same move, the Tisza crowd is being told how awesome it will be to pay a thousand forints per liter of gasoline at Shell stations, without Russian oil.

But here comes the punchline. Magyar Péter, who spent three days idolizing Cristiano Ronaldo — that is, Jockey Wing — realized the message was wrong, because once again it proves that he is the man, the puppet, of multinationals, banks, Brussels, and the globalists. So he’s going to shove the Dallas guy to the back of the shelf, just like Kulja, Ruszin-Szendi, and Tarzoltán before him.

🎯 Core Function (Real Purpose)

The text is not an economic analysis, not fuel-market information, and not a political debate. Instead, it serves as:

  • existential fear-mongering (“1,000-forint fuel”),
  • a narrative of external coercion (“they are forcing it on us”),
  • internal traitor-building (TISZA, Magyar Péter),
  • reinforcement of voter identity (“we’re not idiots”).

👉 The conclusion is pre-set, not reached at the end:
Brussels + multinationals + TISZA = against the Hungarian people / Fidesz = protection.

1️⃣ “They want to force it on us” – the coercion narrative

“Brussels wants to force a multinational executive on us…”

🔹 Technique: external coercion framing
🔹 Effect:

  • The issue is framed not as a political debate, but as an external attack.
  • The voter is not expected to evaluate, but to defend.

📌 Classic authoritarian communication: “this is not a choice, it’s an assault.”

2️⃣ “1,000-forint fuel” – numerical shock therapy

“they are shoving 1,000-forint fuel down Hungarian drivers’ throats”

🔹 Technique: numerical shock + fear stacking
🔹 What it does:

  • A concrete number → immediate emotional reaction
  • No timeframe, no conditions, no causal chain

👉 This is not a factual claim, but an emotional alarm signal.

3️⃣ Multinationals + oil + Shell – chained scapegoating

“without Russian oil, at Shell stations”

🔹 Technique: scapegoat chaining
🔹 Logic:
lack of Russian oil → multinationals → foreigners → expensive fuel

📌 Instead of real market factors, a moral enemy chain is constructed.

4️⃣ Cristiano Ronaldo as “Jockey Wing” – mocking delegitimization

“he idolized Cristiano Ronaldo, aka Jockey Wing”

🔹 Technique: ridicule framing + reputational poisoning
🔹 Purpose:

  • The message is not attacked, the person is mocked
  • “Celebrity” = “superficial,” “foreign,” “not serious”

👉 This turns the entire narrative into a circus.

5️⃣ Magyar Péter as a “puppet”

“the man of multinationals, banks, Brussels, and globalists”

🔹 Technique: puppet framing
🔹 Effect:

  • The political actor is portrayed as non-autonomous
  • Every action is presented as the result of foreign interests

📌 This voids the meaning of democratic choice:
if he wins → it wasn’t really our decision.

6️⃣ “Put on the back shelf” – insinuation of internal instability

“just like Kulja, Ruszin-Szendi, and Tarzoltán”

🔹 Technique: internal purge narrative
🔹 Effect:

  • TISZA appears fragmented and chaotic
  • The leader seems unreliable, constantly discarding allies

👉 Contrast:
they = chaos / we = stability.

🧩 Summary – what is really happening?

This text:

  • does not prove, it merely insinuates,
  • does not explain, it intimidates,
  • does not debate, it labels,
  • does not ask, it closes the discussion.

🎯 Its real function:
to transform economic anxiety into political loyalty.

If you want, I can:

  • 🔍 produce a point-by-point factual rebuttal,
  • 🎥 adapt this into a voice-over script for video,
  • 📊 create a visual propaganda-logic map (actor → message → effect).

balazska and propaganda

Could it be that the globalist corporate boss, István Kapitány, will become the TISZA party’s candidate for prime minister?? We wouldn’t be surprised!!

We’re talking about this with Balázs Bende, while he’s sipping tea from a Trump mug, about how Magyar Péter is glorifying the “captain,” the multinational corporate man. But maybe he wasn’t sent here only to take away utility price cuts — maybe he was sent here instead of Magyar Péter. This is serious trouble. I wouldn’t feel calm in his place.

If we look at it, they’ve built exactly the same origin story, the same kind of legend surrounds him. Basically, the two men are now on roughly the same level. In terms of popularity, the “captain” is actually doing slightly better. They might just replace the messiah.

You know how brutal it is that Magyar Péter started posting about him, and then suddenly stopped posting about the captain? Maybe he feels that something is wrong. Maybe he senses something coming.

🎯 Propaganda Analysis – “The Németh–Balázs Narrative”

Core function (real objective):
This is not about informing the public, but about eroding trust and fomenting internal division within the TISZA camp. The aim is to portray Magyar Péter as replaceable, controllable, and even threatened, while simultaneously constructing an alternative “savior” figure.

1️⃣ Conspiracy framing (“they were sent here”)

🔹 Technique: conspiracy framing
🔹 How it works:

  • “They weren’t sent here only to take away utility price cuts.”
  • “Maybe they were sent here instead of Magyar Péter.”

👉 This implies a behind-the-scenes deal without any evidence. The passive construction (“were sent”) removes the subject, making the claim impossible to falsify.

2️⃣ “Globalist corporate boss” labeling

🔹 Technique: stigmatizing framing
🔹 Target: Kapitány István

Terms like “corporate man” and “globalist” carry negative emotional charge in Fidesz-aligned communication. The point is not the biography, but to trigger reflexive rejection.

3️⃣ Building a messiah myth, then relativizing it

🔹 Technique: hero construction → leveling
🔹 Key line: “Basically, the two men are now on the same level.”

👉 First, a legend is built around Kapitány; then he is pulled down to the same level as Magyar Péter, sending a clear message:

there are no irreplaceable leaders

4️⃣ Seeding internal paranoia (“he feels something is wrong”)

🔹 Technique: mind-reading + fear seeding
🔹 How it works:

  • “He stopped posting about the captain.”
  • “He can feel that something is wrong.”

👉 Motives and emotions are attributed instead of facts, conditioning the audience to see Magyar Péter as weak, uncertain, and under threat.

5️⃣ “Tea-sipping” visual irony

🔹 Technique: symbolic ridicule
🔹 Element: Trump-themed mug
🔹 Figure: Bende Balázs

👉 The light, ironic setting normalizes serious allegations, as if “we’re just chatting,” while serious character assassination is taking place.

🧠 Summary – What does this propaganda do?

  • Divides (leader vs. leader)
  • Creates uncertainty within the TISZA camp
  • Pre-packages a narrative for a future internal conflict
  • Prepares the ground for delegitimization, regardless of who the candidate is

👉 This is not about Kapitány. And it’s not really about Magyar Péter either.
👉 It’s about asserting that anyone can be replaced, and that nothing outside the Fidesz sphere is truly autonomous.

fidesz domain… and szentkiralyi alexandra… not need words..

Very embarrassing! Magyar Péter has been caught out — Tisza has already snapped up the “kireszavazzak2030” and “mostvagysoha2030” websites for itself. 😂
🤦‍♀️ He could at least show his own voters some respect and, even if he’s this certain about his defeat, refrain from immediately scheming for the next one.
But in the end, it doesn’t really matter to us. We’re living in an age of danger; what’s needed here is a strong, experienced leader, not website warriors.
🟠 That’s why the safe choice is Fidesz and Orbán Viktor!

“Now or never 2030,” “Who should I vote for in 2030?” Did you see it? I did, I did. Well, I think this is the real ugly exposure — when it turns out that Magyar Péter is already preparing for the election after ’26, because he’s practically squandered the 2026 elections. So be it.

orban propaganda

Sunday pancake-making, and in the meantime some particularly good news.
Because Viktor Orbán has received a letter — and not from just anyone, but from Donald Trump himself. The letter is about Donald Trump forming a peace council, and in this peace council he is inviting the Hungarian prime minister not just to any position, but essentially as a representative of the founding countries.

The purpose of this peace council is to bring together world leaders who will work jointly for peace, and I think nothing illustrates better how important Viktor Orbán’s efforts for peace have been in recent years than this. The world’s most powerful leader, Donald Trump, clearly evaluated this the same way if he thought that Viktor Orbán belongs in such an initiative. Not as a follower, not afterward, but as a founder.

❗️Viktor Orbán has received a letter from Donald Trump!❗️
The Hungarian government’s peace policy, which it has represented for years, has once again borne fruit. This week, the President of the United States of America sent an official invitation to the prime minister to join the Gaza Peace Council, whose goal is to ensure lasting peace in the Middle East.

As Donald Trump put it, the activities of the peace council will involve the world’s greatest leaders — including Hungary — working together to bring about a historic and magnificent agreement. The invitation is yet another proof of the success of the anti-war policy.

It is becoming increasingly clear: the Hungarian path, the path of peace, is the right path. As we have said all along.
That is why the sure choice is Fidesz.

🎯 Core Function (Real Purpose)

This statement is not diplomatic information, but rather:

  • leader legitimation (Orbán portrayed as a global peacemaker),
  • appeal to external authority (Trump framed as “the most powerful leader in the world”),
  • pre-announced campaign conclusion (“therefore the safe choice is Fidesz”),
  • retrospective validation of a pre-declared narrative (“we have been saying this all along”).

👉 The conclusion is not reached at the end; it governs the text from start to finish.

1️⃣ “A letter arrived” – intimate narrative + transfer of authority

🔹 Technique: personal storytelling (domestic framing)
🔹 How it works:

  • “Sunday pancake baking” → everyday normality, intimacy
  • suddenly → global political significance

🔹 Effect:

  • the audience does not hear an official announcement,
  • but a “confidential piece of good news,”
  • which feels emotionally more credible than a government statement.

👉 A classic soft-propaganda entry point.

2️⃣ Authority import: Donald Trump

🔹 Technique: authority borrowing
🔹 Key phrase:

“The most powerful leader in the world, Donald Trump…”

🔹 Trick:

  • Trump’s assessment = objective truth
  • if he sees it this way → it is beyond dispute

🔹 Manipulation:

  • no quotation from the letter,
  • no official document,
  • no international confirmation,
  • yet it is treated as an established fact.

👉 The source is not verifiable, but emotionally too strong for the audience to question.

3️⃣ “Not as a follower, but as a founder” – hierarchy manufacturing

🔹 Technique: status inflation (rank inflation)
🔹 How it works:

  • not about participation,
  • but about an exceptional position (“founding countries”).

🔹 Effect:

  • Orbán is not a partner,
  • not a participant,
  • but a historical key figure.

👉 This is not foreign policy, but leader mythology.

4️⃣ Peace policy = personal virtue

🔹 Technique: policy → character transformation
🔹 Logical slippage:

  • no concrete peace agreement,
  • no tangible result,
  • yet: “it has delivered results.”

🔹 Narrative logic:

Orbán wants peace → the world recognizes it → therefore he was always right

👉 Circular reasoning, without evidence.

5️⃣ Gaza as scenery, not substance

🔹 Technique: symbolic anchoring
🔹 Observation:

  • the goals of the “Gaza Peace Council” are not specified,
  • no legal status,
  • no international list of members,
  • no mechanisms.

🔹 Function:

  • the name of a grave conflict → adds narrative weight,
  • but without content.

👉 The conflict is a tool, not the subject of analysis.

6️⃣ Pre-manufactured conclusion: Fidesz

🔹 Technique: campaign closure
🔹 Structure:

  • “as we have said all along”
  • “it is becoming increasingly clear”
  • “therefore the safe choice”

🔹 Effect:

  • no alternative,
  • no deliberation,
  • no debate.

👉 The political decision becomes a moral obligation.

🧠 Summary – what is actually happening?

This text:

  • does not prove,
  • does not inform,
  • is not verifiable,

but instead:

✔️ manufactures emotional legitimacy,
✔️ authenticates itself through external authority,
✔️ communicates a pre-closed political decision.

👉 Classic campaign propaganda, labeled as “peace,” within a leader-centered narrative.

orban propaganda from dezse

Hi everyone! According to the “dream book” of politics, it is not advisable to label voters. To speak harshly about them, to criticize them, to demean or degrade them. But I think that is the dream book of politicians. I am not a politician. I am a journalist, although I do not really consider myself one. On Facebook, for lack of a better option, I selected it from a dropdown menu. Media worker, presenter—that probably fits me better.

And when I tell you that, even separating myself from my employer, I am speaking as Krisztián Lentulai, a Hungarian citizen, because I am expressing my feelings to you, then take it that way.

Those people from Tisza. Those from DK. But above all now, the Tisza supporters. Those who wish for my death. Those who want to wait for me at my workplace and smash my head in. Those who, in a somewhat gentler way compared to the previous ones, simply want me to lose my job. Or want me thrown into prison.

I hold them responsible for it if hell breaks loose here and a civil war situation develops. I hold them very, very responsible.

🎯 Core Function (real objective)

The text is not a personal confession, but rather:

  • enemy construction,
  • moral self-exoneration for one’s own aggressive speech,
  • fear-mongering, and
  • preemptive scapegoating for a potential future conflict.

👉 The ultimate message:
“If there is violence, it won’t be because of me, but because of them.”

This is one of the most serious propaganda maneuvers.

1️⃣ “I am not a politician” – role masking (role laundering)

Key statements:

  • “I am not a politician.”
  • “I am speaking as a Hungarian citizen.”
  • “I am expressing my feelings.”

🔹 Technique: evasion of responsibility
🔹 Trick:
– while delivering a political message,
– the speaker detaches himself from political accountability

👉 Classic propaganda move:
political speech = “just a private opinion.”

2️⃣ Pseudo-objectivity and status shifting

Key elements:

  • “I am a journalist, although I don’t consider myself one”
  • “media worker, host”
  • “independent even from my employer”

🔹 Technique: identity blending
🔹 Effect:
– when advantageous: journalist
– when responsibility arises: private individual

👉 This is credibility maneuvering, not honesty.

3️⃣ Collective stigmatization (group guilt)

Keywords:

  • “those Tisza supporters”
  • “DK supporters”
  • “but above all now, the Tisza supporters”

🔹 Technique: collective labeling
🔹 Operation:
– anonymous, unverified claims
– criminalization of an entire political community

👉 Individual threats ≠ collective guilt

This is a basic propaganda rule:
if no one is named, the stain can be applied to anyone.

4️⃣ Victim posture + fear spiral

Claims:

  • “they wish for my death”
  • “they want to smash my head in”
  • “they want to throw me in prison”

🔹 Technique: victimization
🔹 Problem:
– no evidence
– no concrete individuals
– no mention of legal action or reports

👉 Emotional shock precedes rational evaluation.

5️⃣ Preemptive transfer of responsibility (preemptive blame)

Key sentence (critical):

“I hold them responsible if things spiral out of control here and a civil-war-like situation emerges.”

🔴 THIS IS THE MOST DANGEROUS PART

🔹 Technique: legitimization of future violence
🔹 Logic:
– I am only speaking
– they are provoking
– if something happens, it is their fault

👉 This is a textbook example of authoritarian propaganda.

6️⃣ Implicit threat + moral blackmail

Hidden message:

  • “if you don’t stay silent”
  • “if you criticize”
  • “then you will be responsible”

🔹 Technique: moral pressure
🔹 Effect:
– silencing
– self-censorship
– “better not speak up”

🧠 Summary propaganda formula

Structure of the text:

  • I am not a politician
  • Yet I name political enemies
  • They threaten me
  • I am the victim
  • If violence occurs → it is their fault

👉 This is not an opinion. This is narrative construction.

📌 Final conclusion

This statement is:

  • not innocent,
  • not personal,
  • not journalistic,

but conflict-escalating propaganda, which:

❗ normalizes political hatred
❗ asserts collective guilt
❗ preemptively absolves its own side of all consequences

Speaker: Lentulai Krisztián