❌ According to TISZA, banning right-wing newspapers equals press freedom. Classic Bolshevik tactics!
📰 The banned Bors special issue about TISZA’s austerity measures is in the comments! ⤵️
**Alapjogokért Központ — Never forget.…..
Orbán
“it is not even clear who attacked whom.”
“So, there is a Digital Civic Circle for abused women, but maybe the Tisza people will soon create — or should create — one for abused men, because in my opinion what these people received from Péter Magyar after each video is not something you just put in your pocket.”
Szentkirályi Alexandra can be seen laughing in a video while speaking about abuse, where the above statement is made.
A disgrace to Hungary.
The Center for Fundamental Rights is a public-law analytical institute founded in 2013.
Top (large text):
“A TISZA-affiliated judge banned the issue of Bors about the TISZA package because it ‘harms TISZA’s good reputation’!”
Middle (red banner):
“Banned”
Bottom:
“Here is TISZA’s complete tax package”
On the right-side graphic elements:
Background, smaller text (partially visible, document-style graphic):
Máté Kocsis
😁 The little liar is really in form: after his plan to imprison journalists, now he would even ban newspapers he doesn’t like.
But why does someone want to work in politics who can’t tolerate not only criticism, but not even facts when they are uncomfortable for him? 🤦🏻♂️
Péter Magyar would immediately restrict freedom of speech when it concerns him. After recently losing a lawsuit against Index over the Tisza Party’s austerity package, he then went on to crudely threaten the court — which the Budapest Metropolitan Court, otherwise so sensitive about its “independence,” simply brushed off with a meaningless statement. 🤬
And the fruit of those threats ripened quickly: today, the special issue of Bors — which presents the Tisza Party’s austerity package (and whose content had already been reviewed by a court in another case) — was banned.
What a coincidence that the newspaper presenting Péter Magyar’s austerity package was challenged by a female judge whose name and Budapest address match those of a woman listed on the leaked list of Tisza activists.
What an amazing coincidence! 🤩
Wouldn’t the bare minimum be to assign the case to another judge in such a situation? Or perhaps Péter Magyar’s dear mother, a former leader within the judiciary, “took care of it” again?
Long story short: the little narcissist can’t stand being put in an uncomfortable position by the authors of his economic program — he bans them from speaking, everyone has to shut up, and he denies knowing anyone whenever it suits his interests — never seen them, doesn’t know them, blah blah blah.
Like in the old joke: who should we believe now, Péter Magyar — you, or our own eyes? 😁
He would already erase newspapers through threats — presumably in the name of press freedom — but by now the thinking part of the country (that is, the majority) knows that not a single word of the little lying clown can be believed, and as he grows increasingly nervous, he no longer chooses his methods carefully.
It won’t be as easy to stand in the way of the truth as he imagines. 🤡
114 days to go — and he’ll be smeared on the wall! 🇭🇺
Orbán Viktor previously stated clearly that Russia attacked Ukraine — a fact acknowledged by international law, the UN, and earlier Hungarian government positions.
Now, after reopening talks with Russia, his language has changed. Instead of reaffirming that Russia launched the invasion, he says
“it is not even clear who attacked whom.”
The reality has not changed. Only the narrative has.
This is not a discovery of new facts, but a deliberate reframing: blurring responsibility without explicitly denying it.
It is a classic political maneuver — not peace advocacy, but relativizing aggression to make a strategic pivot more palatable.
The image shows a screenshot of a Facebook post.
At the top:
Post text:
“Attention! From now on it’s worth more! The banned TISZA package is spreading as samizdat!”
(with emojis 😁👍)
Attached image in the post:
Orbán on the Russia–Ukraine war:
“It’s not even clear who attacked whom.”
Did you try to verify the authenticity of this document before publicly claiming that it was prepared by the head of the Tisza Party’s economic cabinet?
As a minister, to state something publicly without having verified the truthfulness of that document would be irresponsible. I am acting responsibly.
Yes, I have just explained that.
But how did you try to verify it?
As I said earlier, I read the Index article. I read the Index article and I follow Hungarian public life, and in that context the statements of the Tisza Party coincide with what Index wrote. Index won this case. Only you are drawing the opposite conclusion from this.
Because the entire article was phrased in the conditional mood. And when newspapers presented this information as a fact, courts later condemned those cases.